BartA

This has been resolved, was probably a caching issue (CDN)

Im starting to see the picture..

first mentioned are the item declarations
then the rule that is applied to them

So i can change the (base) colour of the link in front-page-12 .image-section a
to the accent colour by adding that section to the ruleset

{
			color: %1$s;
		}

The thing is though, thats not the thing going wrong.
Whats wrong is that the original accent colour in the theme (red) is being used as the base link colour whereas in other widgets the default colour is white and on-hover colour is the accent colour..

Im guessing it has to do with how i call the button style .. inside the widget,
because it suddenly dawns to me that the accent colour is used for hyperlinks as well..
And to a button applies a different style than to a hyperlink

Thanks Wes,

The editing wont be a problem.
And youre right, it was 12, not 13.

With regards to the port folio page:
look at the colour of widget footer-2

Hi Scooby,

Thanks for having a look.
Yes, thats the section a referring to.
And it does work, but suppose i have 10 teammembers, then needless to say it is not possible to all shouw them on the mainpage. I would have to link to a team page.
And it would be nice if i could use the same template as the one being used by the port folio.

In my case i would like to use
the port folio to display my work, which is added to the site by adding posts in a defined category (for example “esthetic dentistry”)
and then the team page to display the team members, which are added to the site by adding a post in category “team”

But the genesis core does not allow the use ot two different port folio’s.
Only one can be set up in the genesis settings.

So im wondering if there is a way around that.

To close this off;

I changed the paragraph containing the button to

<p>
<div style=clear:both>
<a class="button large" href="https://tandarts-haarlem.nl">Klik hier voor meer informatie</a>
</div></p>

That solved the problem =D

Andy – yeah im on a chrome browser.
I just checked and to make it even more intresting firefox is also rendering the button out of place, but less so than chrome..

No idea why youre not seeing it on your side..
I’ve just cleared all the caches on the website, maybe that makes a difference to what youre seeing.

Another intresting observation;
i have the genesis share buttons installed but disabled on this landing page.
When i do show them, they appear off centre as well but the “edit” link moves back to the center a line below

Tja, im out of ideas..

This is what the page looks like when using standard full width template
(notice featured image + page title aligned to the left)

This is what the page looks like when using landing page template
(notice every element centered, except for the button which gets pushed to the side)

Hi Andy,

thanks for taking a look!
Have you checked also on a wider (desktop) screen?

On my side it works fine on smaller viewports when everything is placed in one single column.
But on wider screens the button gets misplaced.

(I have cleared the cache btw)

Thats exactly what id like 🙂

and yes in vertical mode i suppose theyd have to be below each other

after more testing i found that various snippets that i took from my main page widgets _can_ be found by doing a google search for it, so all content _has_ been indexed even though it appears as if the page is not being completely rendered when fetching the page as googlebot

So im guessing every widget is being indexed for content properly

im guessing the fade script may have to do with this
(since the text in the widgets only starts to appear when you scroll down)
im pretty much a novice though =)

Thanks

I did. Thanks for following up 🙂

Hi Wes,

thanks a lot for replying.
I dont remember adding that line.
To be sure i just double checked in the v1.1.2 archive thats for download on studiopress
and found this line is actually code from the original css included in the archive.

Either way;
after removing the line the picture still doesnt show

Best regards,
Bart

font problem is resolved,
allfonts doenst allow https connections which my website requires.
Had forgotten i had run into that problem before and worked my way around it by linking to google fonts, even though they dont serve the weight of the font im looking for